Interesting enough I recalled that Rossi used "warship" word a few times starting around November...
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=10#comment-164009 Andrea Rossi January 5th, 2012 at 11:47 AM Dear Bernie Koppenhofer: Thank you for your suggestions, but be sure, we are a well fueled *warship*. Warm Regards, A.R. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516&cpage=11#comment-113768 Andrea Rossi November 8th, 2011 at 2:57 PM Dear Matthew Waters: As I always said, I want not to play foot-ball with the bones of People. My company at the moment is a *warship* in stormy weather, during a hard battle. To invest in it is premature. So far we just sell industrial plants of 1 MW and our Customers are financing us. Warm Regards, A.R. mic Il 29 febbraio 2012 22:28, Axil Axil <[email protected]> ha scritto: > The Case For the US Navy > > > > Reference: > > > > http://pieeconomics.blogspot.com/p/cold-fusion-comedy.html > > > For those who want to read between the lines, the information from this > PieEconomics web site informs us about what really happened doing the recent > DOD LENR evaluation process between the competing LENR systems that occurred > some months ago. > > During that timeframe, Rossi was looking for a US corporate sponsor to > advance and fund the development of his E-Cat. > > We now can state with some certainty, the other competing system was the > LENR system developed by NanoSpire. > > The competing demos resulted in the Rossi’s selection as the leading LENR > system vender with the NanoSpire cavitation base system handed its hat to > look for sponsors elsewhere. > > The NanoSpire is too aggressive and powerful for the DOD with the production > of harsh nuclear radiation and the prolific production of transuranic > transmutation isotopes; something that the DOD would naturally shy away > from. > > Like all losers in the DOD evaluation process, NanoSpire was handled roughly > and this has embittered its CEO Mark LeClire against the various interested > DOD agencies involved doing the evaluation but especially Rossi, his only > competitor. > > This tidbit of new information confirms for me the identity of the DOD > agency that is Rossi’s first costumer. > > It is the US navy, and Rossi now works as a DOD contractor to develop a > large scale power system for US shipboard applications. > > To meet the future power needs of electrically hungry future US shipboard > systems is the reason why Rossi shifted his development efforts from the > home heating market to the industrial large scale power plant > implementation. > > This is also why the National instrument corporate relationship was severed > in preference to a security certified navy automation subcontractor. > > This DOD relationship can tell us much about the investment partners that > now form the main body of the Rossi corporate entity. > > Anyone familiar with how the DOD operates can deduce that the corporate > structure of Rossi’s operation and his associated corporate officers are > former DOD officials and DOD subcontract management in good standing with > many years experience at jumping to the tune of DOD department head string > pullers who will closely follow the dictates of the navy department’s > shipboard power requirements going forward in a security envirrnment. > > > >
