On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:50 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From Harry:
>
>>> From OrionWorks:
>>> What I can say is that the new system involves an alternative way of 
>>> graphing out a periodic orbit - where you plot an "elliptical" orbit on a 
>>> TIME-LINE chart. The orbital distance is the "Y" vertical value and the 
>>> horizontal "X" value is the time value.
>>
>> That graph should look something like a sine curve....or not?
>
> You're on the right track. However the time-line looks more like a
> bouncing ball.

I think I understand now. You are mapping a two dimensional distance
vector to the distance axis of your distance-time graph, so that a
perfectly circular orbit corresponds to a straight line.
This differs from a distance time graph in an introductory course in
physics where the distance axis represents the length of a one
dimensional vector so that a straight line in this graph corresponds
with a stationary body (and by implication zero velocity and zero
acceleration.)




> The "bouncing" part is where the satellite has reached the perihelion
> (closest distance) in the orbital period.

I am puzzled by this. Why isn't there a "bouncing part" at the aphelion?

> Ironically, at this moment
> in time I would conjecture that it would not be incorrect to stipulate
> that the orbiting satellite is behaving as if it's being influenced by
> a NEGATIVE gravitational field. That's where the 1/r^3 (cubed) part of
> the algorithm comes into play. It influences the direction the
> satellite is taking by pushing it away. Traditionally speaking, we are
> used to interpreting that aspect of the orbit as the influence of
> centripetal action. It's all a matter of interpretation! The cubed
> (negative forces) influence only comes into play in close proximity to
> the planet for which the satellite is orbiting around. At farther
> distances, the normal 1/r^2 (attractive forces) take over.
>
> It's really kind of a nifty perspective, if not a little wacky! ;-)
>
> Regards
> Steven Vincent Johnson
> www.OrionWorks.com
> www.zazzle.com/orionworks
>

Reply via email to