Rossi confirm the contact but present a different version http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=580&cpage=9#comment-197583
so either it is as he says, with some misunderstanding. or the "Wright" is a fake partner of rossi. I have a tendency not to believe Rossi is a total scam, just a loose businessman and loose engineer, but claimed behavior of the regulator is ... weak. maybe are the "consensus believers" so sure CF is false that they don't care to regulate it. 2012/3/11 Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> > krivits is only relayin the unsourced data that orbit around... hoak or > not ? > > the claimed answer of Rossi is clear false, but is seems that anyway few > times he pretend such false things, > like no radioactivity, no nuclear reaction... while weaker assertion could > be perfect (no radioactivit much higher than background, no nuclear waste > after some short time)... > > I've always been surprised how much rossi could be loose with claims, > science, numbers, units... shameful for an engineer. > > > 2012/3/11 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > >> This is surrealistic even by Rossi's standards. >> >> >> I believe Krivit is wrong about thing. I do not think the Rossi ever >> claimed there is a nuclear reaction in his device. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
