And that comment is actually very misleading. Dick Smith didn't even bother
to try an negotiate anything with Defkalion. He backed away almost
instantly when they in principal accepted his offer. The idea he could test
without an NDA of some sort is ridiculous. Certainly Defkalion would have a
right to protect some aspects of information disclosed to or discovered by
testers and they never ever suggested results of the tests would be governed
by an NDA. Dick Smith is not serious about this and has a preformed bias
about what is happening.
Ransom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Xavier Luminous" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan drops his support of Rossi
2012/3/16 Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]>:
Hyperions, then there is no reasons to doubt their words. (Too bad that
Dick
Smith cancelled the opportunity to test hyperions rigorously, if he had
not,
then we already would know whether Hyperions are real or phoney.)
That's a little misleading. If I remember correctly, Dick Smith
cancelled because Defkalion didn't agree to full disclosure of the
test results (or something like that)
