This is the very interesting quote by LeClair.

"The experiment gave off powerful crested cnoid de Broglie Matter wave
soliton wave packages that were doubly periodic and followed the Jacobi
Elliptic functions exactly, mostly in the form of large doubly-periodic
vortices. Hundreds of wave trains and vortices appeared everywhere and are
permanently burned into walls, objects and trees surrounding the lab.  -Mark
LeClair,  Nanospire"

I don't know. "crested cnoid de Broglie Matter wave soliton wave packages".
too many hi-falutin' words all in one sentence!

 

What are LeClair's credentials?  From his own statement, he worked at the.

"Lockheed Missiles and Space Fluid Dynamics Group, I'm not afraid to say
that my knowledge of physics and mathematics rivals anyone else in the
field."

 

Given that he's probably a pretty sharp cookie, his statement about the
"wave trains and vortices being permanently burned into walls, objects and
trees surrounding the lab" is really quite astounding.  I'd like to see some
piccys of the walls, objects and trees.

 

Interesting legal conundrum.

If he gets sued for causing health problems to people living or working
nearby, or even property damage to neighboring buildings, and government or
expert witness physicists testify that he couldn't possibly be causing any
nuclear reactions, then how does one connect his activities with the claimed
negative health affects and property damage?

 

-Mark

 

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 7:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:the desktop supernova

 

 

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote:

 

Looks like Mr. Zweig has taken some liberties with the truth.

 

 

My apologies to Mr. Zweig.  I misread his blog statement.  The claims of
tree damage come from a letter sent to Krivit:

 

 
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/31/new-energy-times-issue-36-letters/


 

by LeClair (half way down).  If true (I would love to see photographs), Mr.
Zweig is right to be concerned about the health of the public in nearby
public facilities.

 

T 

Reply via email to