*The point I was attempting to make was that the authors of the paper tried
to come up with an explanation of the experimental results and the best
they could do was “The Magnetic Monopole” There is no such thing as a
magnetic monopole. *

* *

*My post attempted to show that the experimental results claimed in the
paper could be explained based on the action of ionic crystals.*

* *

*The formation of these crystals is theatrically possible as explained in
the post titled “New physical attraction between ions in quantum plasmas”*

* *

*I say in that thread as follows:*

* *

*This attractive electron field also forces naked positively charges nuclei
together that have had their coulomb barrier stripped as described in my
post titled “the magnetic monopole.”*
* *

* *
* *

*When these naked nuclei come into contact, the nuclear force takes over to
form new elements.  *

* *

*So sorry ... please excuse me, I had a change of heart overnight about how
positively charged nuclei could be drawn close together so the strong force
could come into play thereby reforming new elements.*

* *

* *


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:52 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:54:13 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >Nuclear Binding energy must be conserved. The regrouping of nuclei does
> not
> >involve the strong force. It is governed by the weak force.**
> >
> >*See Phenomenological Model on page 8 of*
> >
> >*http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf*
>
> I think this paper is utter nonsense. There are no magnetic monopoles, the
> and
> the track on the photo could easily be caused by a malfunction of the photo
> processing equipment, or something simply dragged rapidly across the photo,
> skipping as it went (probably accidentally). (Sometimes an object dragged
> across
> a surface rapidly will bounce up and down rapidly at the same time.) Or
> dragging
> the negative across a piece of grit may do it.
>
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:34 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:02:49 -0400:
> >> Hi,
> >> [snip]
> >> >With their nuclei destroyed by
> >> >the induced negative charge, a swarm of homeless protons and neutrons
> look
> >> >to regroup anew to form new elements both strange and wondrous.
> >>
> >> ...what has become of the nuclear force which binds nuclei together?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Robin van Spaandonk
> >>
> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
> >>
> >>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
>

Reply via email to