>From the article: *One of the features of these new particles, which the team christened 'dipolaritons', is that they are stretched out in a specific direction rather like a bar magnet. *
*And just like magnets, they feel extremely strong forces between each other.* *Such strongly interacting particles are behind a whole slew of recent interest from semiconductor physicists who are trying to make condensates, the equivalent of superconductors and superfluids that travel without loss, in semiconductors.* Strongly interacting particles form condensates. These particles exchange quantum characteristics until they all look alike and become in fact the same super particle. If a condensate forms, then the Electromagnetic force becomes a short range force, because the coulomb barrier is shielded. When superconductivity is involved, it’s a new ballgame, and all kinds of strange things become possible. On another note, I now understand why integral was so coy in our conversations. I had the feeling he had the answer and was letting me twist slowly, slowly in the wind. If integral is right, I will need to learn quantum ring theory. But Brillouin Energy also gets good results using basically the same mechanism and they use standard theory. Success at cold fusion does not reliably pin down what is really going on. And then there is the other dozen types of cold fusion causations to consider, including cavatation, Arata powder, and transmutation in living things. The cold fusion puzzle is not over yet. On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, integral.property.serv...@gmail.com < > fusion.calo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Another quote from Vortex which may clarify the concept: "it was pointed >> out by someone the importance of Fe powder influenced by RFG to both >> align Ni lattice structure and oscillate the hydride ion into such a >> state to neutralize the Zitterbewegung helical energy, thus reducing the >> barrier allowing a neutron to fuse with the nucleus leaving an electron >> in the hydride space. " >> > > Forgive my complete ignorance. Following is what I gather from the above > description: > > 1. Under normal conditions, neutrons being created from some source > (not mentioned here) are too energetic to react with nuclei in the system. > In order for a reaction to take place, they must be moderated. > 2. To moderate the neutrons, you have to neutralize "Zitterbewgung > helical energy," something you only see described on free energy sites. > 3. To neutralize Zitterbewgung helical energy, you dope the Ni lattice > structure with Fe, get hydride ions in there as well, and then subject the > system to electromagnetic radiation (photons) at the right frequency, which > causes the hydride ions to flip around. > > Where do the neutrons come from? Where do the hydride ions come from? > Where do the hydride ions go? > > This more complex a setup than I was envisioning from the quantum > tunneling experiment. In the article, there doesn't appear to be any need > for hydride ions to get the electron to tunnel through a semiconductor; > this happens due to obscure reasons connected to photon being bound up with > the electron such that a new particle is created (a "dipolariton"). I > was imagining a high energy photon (maybe in the gamma range?) binding with > an electron, thereby creating a dipolariton which then would tunnel into a > nearby neutron (a sort of inverse beta decay). The (slow) neutron would > then proceed along the lines that people love to hate Widom and Larsen for > proposing. > > All a wild flight of speculation, since I don't have any business even > going there. But what I really like about the experiment is how it > connects photons (e.g., the missing gamma radiation) with electrons and the > modulation of quantum tunneling. > > Eric > >
