It would be interesting to know if some of these (and maybe other "bursty") phenomena were due to self-sustaining generation of micro-fractures - i.e., some kind of tipping into a phase transition.
Also, it would interesting to know if the protons seen long after energy production stops in Piantelli's experiments are due to neutron decays. BTW, Godes of Brillouin has made some new remarks: http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/04/robert-godes-of-brillouin-energy-comments-on-lenr-research/ Axil Axil wrote: > I am interested in the life after death phenomena as an indicator of the > possibility of multiple causes of cold fusion. Some systems show life > after death and others do not; Rossi yes, the Brillouin Energy system no. > A > single cause should show the same type of behavior. > > What does (Lattice Energy LLC) theory state in explanation of this life > after death behavior? > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Lewis Larsen (Lattice Energy LLC) has posted a new presentation entitled >> - >> "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs) >> New neutron data consistent with WLS mechanism in lightning" - at - >> http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen >> >> He presents evidence that electrons and protons in coherent/collective >> motion on metal hydride surfaces, where e-m energy is highly focused, >> can >> form low momentum neutrons which initiate LENR events. >> >> Slides 18-20 ("Nucleosynthesis in exploding wires and lightning I-III") >> review the very old (1922) controversy between Wendt and Rutherford on >> whether large current pulses through tungsten wires could induce >> transmutations. (See preprint: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.1222.pdf). >> >> Wendt, using intense current pulses of strongly inductively coupled >> electrons, saw transmutations, whereas Rutherford, using a sparse beam >> of >> uncoupled high velocity electrons, saw none. Rutherford's eminence >> trumped Wendt's more modest reputation. >> >> Now, this cannot be a difficult, nor expensive, experiment to reproduce >> - >> using Wendt's procedure, not Rutherford's. >> >> Has anyone tried to reproduce it? >> >> >> >> >> >> >
