While Brillouin seems well founded, disciplined and scientific it does appear that they have a pretty major problem in that their COP at 2.1 is too low to be commercially useful. I believe they achieved that almost a year ago if the info on their website is anything to go by, and yet in their recent PESN interview if I heard correctly that COP=2.1 was still their best result (so apparently no improvement in last year?). Unfortunately at this stage there doesn't appear to be any basis for a hope that it will improve to commercially useful levels.
On 24 April 2012 13:43, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > Ron, > > I got no complaints with their theory – right or wrong it > is, IMHO, closer to the truth than all the others. The herd is thinning > and I predict we will see a shift toward the Brillouin technology even while > trying to wrap it in their own proprietary theories along with a contingent > of new copy cats that will now jump in. The real excitement may come in the > form of spinoffs as science finally discovers where these reports of half > life anomalies are stemming – perhaps this is why the Mayan calendars > expire in 2012 as we discover how to manipulate time? > > Fran > > > > From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:07 AM > To: vortex-l > Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Oil Price.com features Brillouin CF Reactor > > > > Greetings All, > > In case that you haven t see this before: > > http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/New-LENR-Machine-is-the-Best-Yet.html > > > > Respectfully, > > Ron Kita, Chiralex
