It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the long run. Maybe the
'Brillo boys' have not run their device for a long enough period to generate
detectable products.
If they are following this discussion perhaps one of them would respond to your
pertinent question about the detection of helium. That would help to clarify
the data.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 4:39 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Oil Price.com features Brillouin CF Reactor
Well, the short answer is instantaneous. The Brillo boys are using a variant
f W-L theory, which to the thinking of many of us has more holes than
unkin’ – since neutrons activate everything in the surroundings … but with
curious twist. That twist makes it fully falsifiable - and if it proves
ccurate, then it is NOT “freshly minted neutrons” which is the key, so much
s the instant jump to “freshly minted deuterium” and beyond to instant
elium.
IOW to his everlasting credit, Godes has a theory portends to be completely
alsifiable – since he has said this reaction involves the synthesis of
eutrons, but which progresses immediately to deuterium, then to helium as
f was a single reaction. He gives every indication of having detected
elium, but no, he has NOT ever come out and said it directly AFAIK.
He is way out on a limb with this, BUT if he can show actual helium from the
eaction - and with only protium at the start – then all of us will have to
ay that he probably got it right … and at a time when W-L could not close
he deal… so he will deserve all the credit, despite the similarity.
From: David Roberson
Why would all of the freshly minted neutrons collect with
rotons only and not any of the other nearby nuclei?
Is it possible that Brillouin is using a truly different
ath for energy production in their device as compared to Rossi and DGT?
Dave
