In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 9 May 2012 19:00:06 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Since the original electrons in the system are fermions, one of the spinon
>and chargon has to be a fermion, and the other one has to be a boson. One
>is theoretically free to make the assignment in either way, and no
>observable quantity can depend on this choice. The formalism with bosonic
>chargon and fermionic spinion is usually referred to as the "slave–fermion"
>formalism.
>
>If “chargon” is a boson, it could support a condensate within the two
>dimensional crystal that enables a charge accumulation mechanism whereby
>the large electric charge which has been decupled from the electron; either
>positive or negative localized in a very small volume can remove the
>coulomb barrier to allow fusion to occur.
[snip]
I'm not quite sure how this ties in, or even if it does, but if you take a look
at my model (http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Non-relativisitic.pdf) you will see
that electrons in sub-orbitals have fractional angular momentum that depends on
the quantum number.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to