What I was describing is the spin hall effect in a one dimensional topological insulator… see page 8 of last reference.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > http://arxiv.org/pdf/0909.3060.pdf > > > > Electric charge enhancements in carbon nanotubes > > > > On page 4 of the reference, three of my recently made assertions are > demonstrated. > > > > 1. Charge is concentrated at the tip of the tube, > > > > 2. Tube Charge will be attracted to and amplified by the contract > with the lattice where the charge will accumulate. > > > > 3. The lattice will respond to the concentrated charge from the tube > with an induced counter charge that is capable of lowering the coulomb > barrier. > > > > In an electron rich hydrogen envelope where there is a large excess of > degenerate electrons produced by spark discharge, the figures for charge > density listed in the reference will be greatly exceeded. The degenerate > electron will pack onto the surface of the nanotubes. > > > > This theory is applicable to the Chin type reaction. > > In addition, remember that excess degenerate electrons will also lower the > coulomb barrier broadly by long range opposite charge induction. > > > > *If someone can find a reference to paper that shows the spin of free > electrons* > * * > > *(i.e. not attached to atoms), I'd love to see it. :)* > > > > Look into dirac cones on the surface of three dimensional topologic > insulators. The spin will move in synchrony with the circular path of the > electron around the cone. > > > > I believe this is called strong spin orbit coupling. > > > > > http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/topomat11/hasan/pdf/Hasan_TopoMat11_KITP.pdf > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 22 May 2012 22:33:09 -0400: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >Many delocalized electrons would orbit the diameter of the nano-tube in a >> >cooper paired counter rotational spin up spin down couplet. The electron >> >motion would be superconductive and the total excess charge would be >> >proportional to the length of the nanotube. >> > >> I'm not sure that free electrons even have spin. >> Consider the following and show me where I'm wrong. :) >> >> Draw an ellipse on a piece of paper. >> Cut it out. >> Stick a pin through one of the foci. >> >> The ellipse as a whole can be rotated about the pin. This is "l" (quantum >> number). >> >> The movement of the electron around the circumference of the ellipse is >> "s". >> >> No closed orbit -> no "s". >> >> If someone can find a reference to paper that shows the spin of free >> electrons >> (i.e. not attached to atoms), I'd love to see it. :) >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >
