OH my! What is your major malfunction? Are you experiencing major cognitive
dissonance? The Darwinian Evolution Religion you've pledge yourself to is not
as factual as you thought it was? Did I just hit a central nerve? I thought
we were discussing with civility? I guess I just pissed you off too much with
facts and logic.
OK. Whatever.
Jojo
PS. Folks, if James' response does not illutrate my point enough, nothing
will. Darwinian Evolution is a religion to its adherents. When someone brings
up a good point of logic, they experience major cognitive dissonance and react
like this.
Parks experiences this everytime someone brings up evidence for Cold Fusion.
Darwinists experience this when they can not answer a valid criticism of its
Darwinian religion.
The parallel has been clearly illustrated. My point is proven.
----- Original Message -----
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
OK, so you don't think you need an experiment.
Go fuck yourself.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I am unsure about your point or what you are asking.
What exactly is your discussion point or what exactly is your question?
Of course,there are strong inference. For example, if you find the
presence of Information in DNA, that is an inference for Intelligent Designer,
not Darwinian Evolution based on randon chance mutations. Random processes
never create Information, because information is "Order", the exact opposite of
Randomness.
For instance, the assembling of random letters into a coherent sentence
requires the input of an Intelligent being. If your throw a bunch of Scrabble
letters on the ground, the following 2 sentences have equal chance of occuring.
"There is a God"
"ethresi da Go" - (No, this is not a foreign language. This is
a random mixture of the same letters above.)
What is the difference between the 2 sentences above. Nothing as far as
randon chance is concerned. Yet for an Intelligent Entity, there is a huge
difference. What differentiates the 2 sentences? It is Information of course.
There is information in the first sentence that conveys an idea? And Ideas
are the purvue of Intelligent Beings.
Now, do this with 4 letters and create a sentence 600,000 letters long; you
might begin to understand the complexity and the remarkable presence of
Information in our DNA.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
No. I'm talking about the scientific technique of strong inference.
In strong inference you are not simply testing a hypothesis. You are
admitting multiple hypotheses in the formulation of your experiments and
attempting to most economically compare them. It is legitimate, of course, to
have any number of experiments to achieve this comparison.
In this case, there are two hypotheses: Darwinian Evolution and
Intelligent Design.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Distinguish what from what?
Are you asking if there are experiments in Darwinian Evolution and
experiments in Intelligent Design?
----- Original Message -----
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
Jojo,
Where is the controlled experiment that distinguishes between the
two? There are LOTS of controlled experiments demonstrating cold fusion.
