Did you utilize a high pressure hydrogen envelope? Did you test for transmutation? I doubt that an air envelope will give positive results in terms of anomalous energy production. But that is just a guess.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:52 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Several years ago I tried Titanium Oxide Nano powder. I got a free sample > in a jar, I forget from where. I sent sparks through the powder it at near > vacuum to a pressure of one atm. I only got smelly dust. > No anomalous energy. > > Frank Z > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ecat builder <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, May 28, 2012 11:25 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nano dust fusion > > Jojo, > > It seems like one should do the trick--DGT seemed to be just jolting their > experiment to get an increased output--perhaps just to disassociate the H2. > But.. One big missing data point is from you: what have you tried, what has > worked, and what hasn't. I think once we get a reproducible NiH LENR > project that produces something real, fine tuning it with another spark > plug, voltage, pressure, heating element, etc. would be much easier. > But I think one spark plug should be effective.. as it sure looked like > DGT was just sparking their reactor very briefly to get it to heat up. > > > There is an interesting thread on dust fusion on Talk-Polywell: > > http://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=3531&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 > Seems to me an easy way to replicate the transmutation of elements using > low power. > It includes links to video, replication attempts, and some good discussion > and speculation. > My video of me nearly blowing up my microwave is posted there. > > - Brad > > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote: > > After reading the entire paper front to back, I am overwhelmed by the > > complexity of his experimental setup. Seems too complex and finnicky to > be > > scalable for commericial applications. > > > > Although looking at his setup reminds me of DGT cylindrical reactor. > > Specifically, it reminds me of the 2 spark plugs on both ends. I have > been > > pondering a lot on how DGT might be using the 2 spark plugs. It seems > to me > > that 2 spark plug arranged in that fashion would be insufficient to > ionize a > > substantial amount of carbon nanopowders (Assuming DGT uses nanocarbon > like > > Egely.) I am also at a lost in understanding how it can help create some > > mixing. > > > > I wonder if DGT is using the spark plugs to cause oscillations within the > > chamber like I first originally speculated although it seems to me that > the > > power levels imparted by the spark plugs would be too small for such a > task, > > the reactor chamber being huge. In my spark reactor, my volumes are > small > > and I take advantage of thermosiphon so I can concieve of a way to create > > turbulence with a single spark plug. > > > > What are your thought on my comments above? Am I correct in assuming > that > > turbulence inside the reactor is important? It seems that Egely is going > > for oscillations rather than turbulence. > > > > How does one create carbon nanopowder plasma on such a large reactor > chamber > > volume like DGT's reactor? It appears to me that 2 spark plugs are too > > small for the task. > > > > Any thoughts you may have is appreciated. > > > > > > > > Jojo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Axil Axil > > To: vortex-l > > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:37 AM > > Subject: [Vo]:Nano dust fusion > > > > Nano dust fusion > > > > > http://greentechinfo.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/George_Egely_-_Nano_Dust_Fusion_v7.pdf > > > > Dr. George Egely has developed a form of LENR that is uncommon but may > not > > be too far off the mark. > > > > His process is an unusual one. The essential ingredients are dusty plasma > > made from nano‐size carbon particles and air and some water vapor. In its > > simplest version the process works at atmospheric pressure, and at modest > > temperatures at 1000 – 3000 º C. > > > > I would like to offer some suggestions for improvement that are inspired > by > > the work of Rossi, DGT, and Chan et al. > > > > First, lose those hollow quarts balls and the microwave in preference to > a > > spark plug. The plug is more robust and reliable. It will pump many more > > electrons into the plasma due to its high operational voltage then will a > > microwave. > > > > Second, add zirconium carbide nano-powder to the dust; the use of this > metal > > will provide more charge concentration potential to the plasma. The use > of > > zirconium carbide with a work function of 3.38 and a very high melting > > temperature of 3532 °C will thermalize the gamma radiation associated > with > > the nuclear reactions of LENR by using a coherent proton surface charge. > > > > I love carbide of a transition metals because of their high melting > > temperature and their compatibity with carbon powder. Together with > carbon, > > a very hot plasma temperature will increase operational reactor hydrogen > > envelope temperatures to the highest turbo generation efficiencies > possible. > > > > Third, replace the air with a high pressure hydrogen envelope with the > > highest pressure possible. > > > > Some of my reactions to important parts of Dr. George Egely narrative: > > > > On page 6: > > > > My theory of cold fusion centers on charge concentration as the primary > > mechanism for shilding the coulumb barrier. > > > > In support of this concept from Dr, Egely’s text as follows: > > > > Here the more or less familiar rules of quantum mechanics or Q.E.D. > rule. In > > our opinion, strong interaction and “classical” fusion start to dominate > the > > process above a certain power density in the middle layer. Sparking is > > visible on slow motion films. Obviously, the amplitude of oscillation > also > > depends on the plasma radius, pressure, and temperature. At the center of > > the plasma, the amplitudes should be much higher than those at the outer > > wall of the acoustic resonator. (There can be the highest amplitude of a > > spherical standing wave). See Fig. 5 for the three layers. > > > > Near the center of the plasma sphere (middle layer), charge shielding can > > dominate nuclear processes due to the enormous surface charge density of > the > > dust. Then repulsing charges of like protons can be overcome by the huge > > negative charge density of the carbon particles. > > > > On the slow motion video records, one can clearly see the appearance of > > sudden small sparks en mass. Then the Geiger counter starts to click, > though > > at moderate levels. At present no one knows what goes on in the center of > > the acoustic resonator. > > > > In Fig. 6 these simultaneous mechanisms are shown as field amplification > by > > resonant surface polaritons (Fig. 6/a), direct volumetric polarization by > > electron and ion impact (Fig. 6/b), and charge shielding (Fig. 6/c) is > > shown, where strong interaction rules (again at a different size level) > at > > the characteristic size of a nucleon. Obviously these are all > hypothetical > > mechanisms, as they cannot be observed directly. > > > > On page 23 (b) > > > > At higher input energy, the sparking region appears, along a mild degree > of > > radiation – both x rays and particles. (There is a slight radioactivity > in > > the exhausted dust and the quartz sphere after the power is switched off, > > for a couple of days). > > > > > > > > > >
