Dear Peter, For Rossi a physical reason could be an explosion or the melting of the core. I would not interpret it as if there is a well proven model that can explain why the ideal COP is 6. IMHO 6 is where a reactor with that geometry is stable enough not to cause arm, that's the "physical reason".
mic 2012/5/29 Peter Gluck <[email protected]>: > From Rossi's blog: > > ------------------------------------ > Ville Kanninen > May 28th, 2012 at 3:47 PM > You said that COP 6 is the highest possible. > Have you found some very fundamental physical reasons to this limitation > (which you will publish some day) or is this just because of the current > engineering choices ? > kind regards > Ville Kanninen > > Andrea Rossi > May 28th, 2012 at 4:20 PM > Dear Ville Kanninen: > Very good question. We have found physical reasons to this > limitation, and we are going to publish this fact along with the theory. > Thank you. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > I think this (if true) is very disappointing, at a certain moment > it seemed the E-cats will be almost self-sustaining. > > Peter > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
