I would suspect that the hydrogen atoms would tend to spontaneously recombine and emit the bond energy photon. If some form of cavity could be constructed to keep reflecting that energy back into the cloud you might be able to keep a reasonable quantity of mono-hydrogen plus diatomic hydrogen trapped.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: pagnucco <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 1:19 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:A sequel to my post of yesterday Thanks for the information. I need to educate myself on this. Is is possible to create significant amounts of mono-hydrogen imultaneously in a large volume? or maybe at a container surfaces? Chemical Engineer wrote: Well documented in the 1930's. When using it as a torch it is localized near contact with the metals to be welded, cm's from the arc. When used inside a uniformly heated reactor vessel i would think it would happen further from the arc, wherever the atomic hydrogen comes near a surface/atomic structure hungry for some energy... On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote: > Interesting suggestion. > Is it known how much energy can be released, and how localized it is? > > Chemical Engineer wrote: > > A simpler explanation could be the light was observed at the > location(s) > > of > > newly created atomic hydrogen re-associating back to molecular > hydrogen > H2 > > and releasing the large amount of energy gained from the spark > > plug/arcing/disassociation. This localized, high energy release may > then > > trigger the nuclear effects on the surface of the powder, releasing > > additional, anomylous heat. > > > > Wash, rinse, repeat > > > > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote: > > > >> Peter, > >> > >> I tried to respond to Nixter's suggestion on your blogspot that the > >> light > >> burst observed at Defkalion might indicate lasing. I think it failed > to > >> post due to my incorrect selection of buttons. However, what I said > >> was: > >> > >> There is a phenomenon called "random lasing" that can occur in > colloids > >> of > >> metal micro- and nano-particles. I am not sure how intense the > >> resulting > >> electromagnetic fields or temperatures are. It is improbable that > this > >> explains LENR, but maybe it's worth at least a look at whether Rossi > or > >> Defkalion have found optimum operating points for this effect. > >> > >> Lou Pagnucco > >> > >> Peter Gluck wrote: > >> > Dear Colleagues, > >> > > >> > A nice comment has inspired me to write: > >> > > >> > > >> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/05/sequel-to-my-way-to-lenr-truth.html > >> > > >> > It is actually a question, a bit rhetoric but if the things go well > >> > it could be really interesting. > >> > Best wishes, > >> > Peter > >> > -- > >> > Dr. Peter Gluck > >> > Cluj, Romania > >> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
