Been there.............
http://hydride.has.it Warm Regards, Reliable Chemical Engineer Tue, 29 May 2012 11:04:11 -0700 Significant amounts of atomic hydrogen are created by circulating h2 through an electric arc, typically across tungsten electrodes and varying the power input. it makes a bad ass welder due to the heat release when the H associates back to H2 and releases energy. It was discontinued in welding due to the expense of hydrogen. I would think in a closed, fluidized nano reactor the H2 would recirculate back through the electrodes after the H has released it's energy in the lattice/pores/ surface of the dust and re-associated. There should be a sweet spot operating when the heat removed from reactor = heat from association/disassociation (energy from spark plug)+ anomylous. Phase 1: heat reactor to > 600f through controlled sparking Phase 2: Above 600 F the atomic hydrogen production ramps up and so does anomylous heat so be prepared to remove alot more heat than before. Reactor temp will be sensitive to circulation and rate changes in H2--->H--->H2. Poor circulation leads to hot spots/melt downs/quiesence as well as drops in available H. I think the two spark plugs was to provide additional H pruduction and maybe more uniform circulation/ control capability On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote:
Thanks for the information. I need to educate myself on this. Is is possible to create significant amounts of mono-hydrogenq simultaneously in a large volume? or maybe at a container surfaces? Chemical Engineer wrote: > Well documented in the 1930's. When using it as a torch it is localized > near contact with the metals to be welded, cm's from the arc. When used > inside a uniformly heated reactor vessel i would think it would happen > further from the arc, wherever the atomic hydrogen comes near a > surface/atomic structure hungry for some energy... > > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote: > >> Interesting suggestion. >> Is it known how much energy can be released, and how localized it is? >> >> Chemical Engineer wrote: >> > A simpler explanation could be the light was observed at the >> location(s) >> > of >> > newly created atomic hydrogen re-associating back to molecular >> hydrogen >> H2 >> > and releasing the large amount of energy gained from the spark >> > plug/arcing/disassociation. This localized, high energy release may >> then >> > trigger the nuclear effects on the surface of the powder, releasing >> > additional, anomylous heat. >> > >> > Wash, rinse, repeat >> > >> > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote: >> > >> >> Peter, >> >> >> >> I tried to respond to Nixter's suggestion on your blogspot that the >> >> light >> >> burst observed at Defkalion might indicate lasing. I think it failed >> to >> >> post due to my incorrect selection of buttons. However, what I said >> >> was: >> >> >> >> There is a phenomenon called "random lasing" that can occur in >> colloids >> >> of >> >> metal micro- and nano-particles. I am not sure how intense the >> >> resulting >> >> electromagnetic fields or temperatures are. It is improbable that >> this >> >> explains LENR, but maybe it's worth at least a look at whether Rossi >> or >> >> Defkalion have found optimum operating points for this effect. >> >> >> >> Lou Pagnucco >> >> >> >> Peter Gluck wrote: >> >> > Dear Colleagues, >> >> > >> >> > A nice comment has inspired me to write: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/05/sequel-to-my-way-to-lenr-truth.html >> >> > >> >> > It is actually a question, a bit rhetoric but if the things go well >> >> > it could be really interesting. >> >> > Best wishes, >> >> > Peter >> >> > -- >> >> > Dr. Peter Gluck >> >> > Cluj, Romania >> >> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >
