More,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg64616.html
Gluck,
"
IF this system is able to remove the three usual weaknesses of the
majority of the pre-Rossi LENR systems i.e. low intensity, bad
reproducibility and short duration.
Peter
"
Systems ok. Weakness only by operator. Easy. "10 Plate Heat Exchanger SS304
Copper Brazed 7.5" x 2.9""
from "dudadiesel" Make nano Ni hexane mix. Put in exchanger. Vac pump dry. Pipe
propane bleed through T with spark plug. Buzz ignition plug to make heavy H
"crystals" and black soot. Water 90 C other side of duda gets pressure steam.
Easy.
Gluck Blog not permit comment. Use SLACKO OS.
By,
Chung
and
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg65839.html
Axil Axil
Sat, 19 May 2012 14:07:54 -0700
I am still of the opinion that Rydberg matter is the key active agent in
both the Rossi and DGT reactors. Rydberg matter is one of the numerous
examples of topologic materials. Other types are carbon nanotubes,
Graphene, transition metal oxides, various superconductor materials…when
the list is completely filled out, the number included in the list will
run into the tens of thousands.
http://physicsworld.com/blog/2012/05/how_to_cook-up_a_new_topologic.html
*How to cook up a new topological insulator* I now believe that Rossi
and LeClair each stumbled onto a thermionic based topological material
that is not ideal for cold fusion reactor engineering. Carbon nanotubes
may be better because their charge control mechanism is based directly
on electric simulation rather than thermal stimulation. The good
fellows, those carbon based reactor developers who are generous enough
to post here at vortex talk of good control of their carbon nanotube
based reactors by varying the pulse rate of the spark plug. >From Mint
Candy: 1. Purchased 60 plate heat exchanger at :
http://www.dudadiesel.com/heat_exchangers.php 2. Purchased Ni at :
http://www.xuzhounano.com/a/About/About_Us/ 3. Mixed Ni & catalyst
powder wth Hexane from J. T. Baker 4. Filled one side exchanger with
suspension. 5. Evacuated two days ending at 250 C. 6. Followed
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] procedure using Medical
Lesion RFG to spark plug. 7. Perfect control using pulse adjustment on
RFG and Propane flow. 8. Incredible steam output steady 2 weeks under
pressure. 9. Operating at 650C. 10. Must now get patent on catalyst.
Note that Mint Candy states as follows: 7. Perfect control using pulse
adjustment on RFG and Propane flow. Mint Candy’s reactor design and
operating principle has little to do with Rossi’s design…outside of
being inspired by it. Mint Candy will have few control headaches
compared to Rossi. Cheers: Axil
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Vo]:A sequel to my post of yesterday
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:10:09 -0500
From: [email protected]
<[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Been there.............
http://hydride.has.it
Warm Regards,
Reliable
Chemical Engineer
Tue, 29 May 2012 11:04:11 -0700
Significant amounts of atomic hydrogen are created by circulating h2
through an electric arc, typically across tungsten electrodes and varying
the power input. it makes a bad ass welder due to the heat release when
the H associates back to H2 and releases energy. It was discontinued in
welding due to the expense of hydrogen. I would think in a closed,
fluidized nano reactor the H2 would recirculate back through the electrodes
after the H has released it's energy in the lattice/pores/ surface of the
dust and re-associated.
There should be a sweet spot operating when the heat removed from reactor =
heat from association/disassociation (energy from spark plug)+ anomylous.
Phase 1: heat reactor to > 600f through controlled sparking
Phase 2: Above 600 F the atomic hydrogen production ramps up and so does
anomylous heat so be prepared to remove alot more heat than before.
Reactor temp will be sensitive to circulation and rate changes in
H2--->H--->H2.
Poor circulation leads to hot spots/melt downs/quiesence as well as drops
in available H.
I think the two spark plugs was to provide additional H pruduction and
maybe more uniform circulation/ control capability
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote:
Thanks for the information. I need to educate myself on this.
Is is possible to create significant amounts of mono-hydrogenq
simultaneously in a large volume? or maybe at a container surfaces?
Chemical Engineer wrote:
> Well documented in the 1930's. When using it as a torch it is localized
> near contact with the metals to be welded, cm's from the arc. When used
> inside a uniformly heated reactor vessel i would think it would happen
> further from the arc, wherever the atomic hydrogen comes near a
> surface/atomic structure hungry for some energy...
>
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote:
>
>> Interesting suggestion.
>> Is it known how much energy can be released, and how localized it is?
>>
>> Chemical Engineer wrote:
>> > A simpler explanation could be the light was observed at the
>> location(s)
>> > of
>> > newly created atomic hydrogen re-associating back to molecular
>> hydrogen
>> H2
>> > and releasing the large amount of energy gained from the spark
>> > plug/arcing/disassociation. This localized, high energy release may
>> then
>> > trigger the nuclear effects on the surface of the powder, releasing
>> > additional, anomylous heat.
>> >
>> > Wash, rinse, repeat
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, wrote:
>> >
>> >> Peter,
>> >>
>> >> I tried to respond to Nixter's suggestion on your blogspot that the
>> >> light
>> >> burst observed at Defkalion might indicate lasing. I think it failed
>> to
>> >> post due to my incorrect selection of buttons. However, what I said
>> >> was:
>> >>
>> >> There is a phenomenon called "random lasing" that can occur in
>> colloids
>> >> of
>> >> metal micro- and nano-particles. I am not sure how intense the
>> >> resulting
>> >> electromagnetic fields or temperatures are. It is improbable that
>> this
>> >> explains LENR, but maybe it's worth at least a look at whether Rossi
>> or
>> >> Defkalion have found optimum operating points for this effect.
>> >>
>> >> Lou Pagnucco
>> >>
>> >> Peter Gluck wrote:
>> >> > Dear Colleagues,
>> >> >
>> >> > A nice comment has inspired me to write:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/05/sequel-to-my-way-to-lenr-truth.html
>> >> >
>> >> > It is actually a question, a bit rhetoric but if the things go well
>> >> > it could be really interesting.
>> >> > Best wishes,
>> >> > Peter
>> >> > --
>> >> > Dr. Peter Gluck
>> >> > Cluj, Romania
>> >> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
