Cy, Cool, It's a 4 cylider!
I guess Hexane makes sure there is no moisture or air mixed with the powder and gets vented Do you know the gain? Gain = Energy out: (Very hot big big steam (flow) @ Very big big pressure) / Energy in ((4 buzzing spark plug volts current) +propane flow) If gain <=1 i will just continue cooking my hot dogs... If it is > 4 you da man! On Wednesday, May 30, 2012, Cy Cle wrote: > No en Hexane + Ni powder mix put in duda evaporate make > deposit walls inside very good > very care no O2 no H2O little propane sent thrrough pipe 4 Ts 4 slpark > plug use 4 auto coil with buz control very good very hot big big > steam big big pressude 600C easy easy you try > CP > > > Chemical Engineer > Wed, 30 May 2012 02:14:57 -0700 > > Peter, I will assume the propane is providing the source for the atomic > hydrogen as opposed to using H2 gas supply. I will assume the propane breaks > down across the spark gap (given enough juice) into atomic hydrogen and > carbon (soot). As long as your reactor kernal remains air tight and small > volume i will assume you do not blow yourself up. As atomic hydrogen > association can create extremely high localized temperatures (3000-5000C) i > will assume you have to be very careful not to melt just your powder/core but > the reactor walls/chamber itself. I will assume the carbon might dampen this > out. This i will assume is one of the reasons why DGT has such a thick > reactor block. I will also assume the very high, localized atomic hydrogen > association heat release in addition to anomolous heat Is what creates the > bright glow and cracked the glass in the DGT unit. If you thought atomic > hydrogen welding was bad ass think nuclear welding. I am encouraged using > propane because i am already experienced with almost blowing myself up > grilling burgers. I will assume i do not know what the hexane is for other > than to keep air out and just another H provider. Of course i have made alot > of assumptions and you know what happens when you ASSume too much! On > Wednesday, May 30, 2012, Peter Gluck wrote: > Dear Integral - or Chang? > > > Thank you, but you have NOT answered my original question that refers to > > the classic Pd-D cell and to the nanopowder hydogen systems, the questiona > > nd problem is IF their 3 damned weaknesses are inherent, generated by their > > very nature. Or not. > You are describing your proprietary system, give the > data you consider not > secret, claim it is working, but do not tell how long > and do not give > the basic parameters. You have removed the weaknesses- that > is admirable > and I hope the system will become useful on a great scale. I > don't get the > role of propane, hope it is not burned. > my best > technological good wishes to you. > Peter > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:50 > PM, [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> < > > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> wrote: > > More, > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/**[email protected]/msg64616.**html<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg64616.html> > > > Gluck, > > >
