________________________________
Von: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Gesendet: 19:51 Donnerstag, 31.Mai 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: re the alternative history of LENR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Peter
Gluck is on target when he draws distinction in the cold fusion arena between
what he calls LENR and LENR+.
The
major characteristic that describes LENR is that it is accidental whereas LENR+
is intentional.
I believe
that Ed Storms theory on what causes LENR is on the mark. Specifically, it is
nano
sized cracks in the material that are central to the nuclear active environment
(NAE).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Axil,
let me wildly speculate, although I am barely qualified to do so (only
Schroedinger-the Mozart of quantum physics- and other big shots seem qualified
to speculate.)
Anyway.
Mills/Hydrino--Rydberg matter--Superconductivity.
With superconductivity it is
...
The onset of superconductivity is accompanied by abrupt changes in various
physical properties, which is the hallmark of a phase transition. ...
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity#Theories_of_superconductivity
Now 'phase transition' is one of the catch-all terms of our beloved
theoreticians, like dark matter, which is synonymous to 'do'nt know'.
To add insult to the term, it is irregularities in regular structures, which
make phase transitions more probable, or even enable them in the first place.
Ahem -- them 'Terrorists'.
Guenther
