How about some actual quantities, instead of just saying "huge" amounts of
radioactivites.

"The total spent reactor fuel inventory at the Fukushima-Daichi site
contains *nearly half of the total amount of Cs-137* estimated by the NCRP
to have been released by all atmospheric nuclear weapons testing,
Chernobyl, and world-wide reprocessing plants (~270 million curies or ~9.9
E+18 Becquerel)."

Source: http://www.fukushima311watchdogs.org/share.php?partager=1260

Note: this source is definitely not pro-nuclear.

The storage pool at reactor 4 contains about 1500 spent fuel rods. This
amounts to less than 1/6 of the total spent reactor fuel inventory at the
Fukushima-Daichi site. If all of the fuel at Daichi amounts to less than
half of the Cs-137 previously released into the environment, release of all
the Cs-137 in the storage pool at reactor 4 would amount to less than 8% of
the amount previously released into the environment.

As stated previously, there is no conceivable mechanism that would release
all the material in the storage pool at reactor 4.

Since the half-life of Cs-137 is 30 years, the majority of the previously
released amounts are still active in the environment. Any release of Cs-137
from the storage pool at reactor 4 would only increase the amount of Cs-137
in the environment by a negligible amount, certainly not enough to endanger
human life anywhere but the in the immediate surrounding of the plant.

People who continue to spread this fear-mongering propaganda have zero
scientific credibility.

If there is a further accident at Fukushima-Daichi that results in a
release of some of the spent fuel, the fear-mongers will be responsible for
more bad health effects through added stress on the scientifically
illiterate than the radiation release could ever cause.



> Arnie Gunderson, who used to build nuclear fuel pools, has stated if this
> building collapses he sees it likely to produce sufficient fallout to
> endanger human life everywhere in the Northern hemisphere. See ENENews.com
> for ongoing reports on Fukushima.
>
>

Reply via email to