Hi Fran.
What I like about their work, especially the recent stuff, is that it is
based on a physical model.. a physical reality, and not just abstract math.
Clarification please, you wrote:
".such that the effects of the equal and opposite zones are prevented from
cancelling."
R U referring here to a polarization of the vacuum as well, creating a
dipole of some sort?
And this:
"It's all about the segregation of these 'spacetime micro-curvature effects'
mentioned by Nickisch and Mollere."
Again, segregation would imply a separation or concentration of
<what-ever-the-space-fabric-is> into a nonhomogenous state, at least at a
microscopic/nanoscopic level. In my visual model, this separation then sets
up local 'fields' which impart forces onto subatomic particles. At a large
scale these fields manifest as the electric and magnetic fields. Again, I
feel strongly that we could easily come up with better models if we started
from scratch and only considered models which incorporated some physical
reality to them.
I recently posted a msg to the Collective on just such a model which is very
similar to mine, but which has been developed and more importantly
described, to a much greater extent. It is still basically a qualitative
model, but at least it explains numerous phenomena with a logical physical
model; physical entities:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg66212.html
http://cordus.wordpress.com/
For you theoretical types, I think it's worth the read.
-Mark
From: Roarty, Francis X [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 6:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: ZPF-inertia work applied to subatomic particles;
spatial harmonic resonances
Mark,
Nice choice of citations, I believe Haisch and Rueda got
it right but the connection drawn by Nickisch and Mollere (2002):
zero-point fluctuations give rise to spacetime micro-curvature effects
yielding the origin of inertia could, in fact should have gone further.. I
think the wormholes described at the quantum foam level can be responsible
for most of the anomalous claims we are discussing on vortex, from
superconductivity to modification of decay rates, Casimir effect and
unexplained spectrum shifts. What we call isotropic space time is only a
macro effect that can actually be segregated to different levels by matter
and geometry - not giving anything for nothing but isolating equal and
opposing regions of space time that average out to what we consider
isotropic - the Nature paper indicates the space-time is modified by the
lattice but I would posit the material exposed to these regions must be
chosen to have a biased preference for one geometry over another such that
the effects of the equal and opposite zones are prevented from cancelling
and we get these opposing claims of decay modification from different
researches using different lattices or gases.
I posit the lattice equates to the Haisch Rueda abstract
.[snip] in accelerated reference frames results in a force that appears to
account for inertia [/snip] but, velocity relative to a perpendicular
ether isn't needed - instead the "equivalent" velocity of the ether we
perceive as C is directly modified through suppression [taken to extreme
Casimir effect] and results in a much simpler way to modify the Pythagorean
relationship between V and C .. In a Puthoff atomic model I think this
"standard" relationship between matter and C is what establishes the
periodic relationship of elements. This is why this paper in Nature needs
the lattice to create both heavy and speedy electrons and why Rossi and
Mills need the lattice to create relativistic hydrogen [call them hydrinos
or inverse Rydberg hydrogen no matter] - It's all about the segregation of
these "spacetime micro-curvature effects" mentioned by Nickisch and Mollere.
- I think we are at a PV/T moment where time is going to be exposed as the
hidden variable to be manipulated only instead of air conditioners this may
yield free energy, propulsion and even the possibility of temporal effects
at the macroscale.
Regards
Fran
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:FYI: ZPF-inertia work applied to subatomic
particles; spatial harmonic resonances
When I lived in SoCal I visited Dr. Rueda several times to discuss his work
on inertia and the electromagnetic zero-point field. their seminal paper
came out in 1994. Dr. Rueda did the math in that paper, which is waaaaay
above my pay-grade! I now see that they've been applying their work to
atomic physics.
Update on an Electromagnetic Basis for Inertia, Gravitation,
the Principle of Equivalence, Spin and Particle Mass Ratios
http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0209016.pdf
Abstract
A possible connection between the electromagnetic quantum vacuum and inertia
was first published by Haisch, Rueda and Puthoff (1994). If correct, this
would imply that mass may be an electromagnetic phenomenon and thus in
principle subject to modification, with possible technological implications
for propulsion. A multiyear NASA-funded study at the Lockheed Martin
Advanced Technology Center further developed this concept, resulting in an
independent theoretical validation of the fundamental approach (Rueda and
Haisch, 1998ab). Distortion of the quantum vacuum in accelerated reference
frames results in a force that appears to account for inertia. We have now
shown that the same effect occurs in a region of curved spacetime, thus
elucidating the origin of the principle of equivalence (Rueda, Haisch and
Tung, 2001).
[ I separated out the rest of the abstract for emphasis ]
A further connection with general relativity has b een drawn by Nickisch and
Mollere (2002): zero-point fluctuations give rise to spacetime
micro-curvature effects yielding a complementary perspective on the origin
of inertia. Numerical simulations of this effect demonstrate the manner in
which a massless fundamental particle, e.g. an electron, acquires inertial
properties; this also shows the apparent origin of particle spin along lines
originally proposed by Schrodinger. Finally, we suggest that the heavier
leptons (muon and tau) may be explainable as spatial-harmonic resonances of
the (fundamental) electron. They would carry the same overall charge, but
with the charge now having spatially lobed structure, each lobe of which
would respond to higher frequency components of the electromagnetic quantum
vacuum, thereby increasing the inertia and thus manifesting a heavier mass.
And in another paper at arXiv, I believe they incorporate a polarizable
vacuum:
Gravity and the Quantum Vacuum Inertia Hypothesis
http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0504061.pdf
Makes me seriously regret not having the math skills to express my
qualitative models quantitatively.
G'nite all.
-Mark
