They do, about 1/2000th that of a proton.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
Knowledgable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 helloke...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
> From: helloke...@sbcglobal.net
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:FYI: ZPF-inertia work applied to subatomic
particles; spatial harmonic resonances
> Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:41:26 -0700
> Resent-From: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
>
>
>
> Do electons have mass or do they not?
>
>
> Numerical simulations of this effect demonstrate the manner in which a
> MASSless fundamental particle, e.g. an electron, acquires inertial
> properties; this also shows the apparent origin of particle spin along lines
> originally proposed by Schrodinger. Finally, we suggest that the heavier
> leptons (muon and tau) may be explainable as spatial-harmonic resonances of
> the (fundamental) electron. They would carry the same overall charge, but
> with the charge now having spatially lobed structure, each lobe of which
> would respond to higher frequency components of the electromagnetic quantum
> vacuum,
>
>
> thereby increasing the inertia and thus manifesting a heavier MASS.
>
>
> ***A MASSless particle won't manifest a heavier MASS. Either way, the theory
> postulates that electrons would acquire intertia. That means the electrons
> are manipulable, and if they have inertia, they can be pushed away from
> Protons in the Hydrogen nuclei and thus the Coulomb barrier is easier to
> overcome. I postulate this in the thread where I suggest the Poynting
> Asymmetrical Capacitor Thrust vector is discussed
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg66755.html
