20120616 11:49 Akira, Sterling Allan sometimes reminds me of a -blind- hen picking randomly in all sorts of directions.
You never know. -------------------- See eg here: http://pesn.com/2012/06/13/9602109_Fuelsaver--Battle_with_the_lobbies/ This is such a standard scam that one wonders. Very often the scammers believe their own figments. The power of belief going wild. Obviously S.A. has no idea what the TUEV certifies: Safety, NOT the claim itself. Eg stated here, which basically applies to all certification-bodies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_certification ...A product might be verified to comply with a specification or stamped with a specification number. This does not, by itself, indicate that the item is fit for any particular use. ... This is a trap Allan does not seem to be aware of. Safety (as testified eg by UL, as claimed in Rossi's case, does NOT imply proper function ) Most easily a placebo can be certified as 'safe'. It is a pity that those cannot be patented anymore. -------------------- To Allan's defense I would say that he still seems to have some residual critical mind, which weeds out the most absurd claims. At times, at least. Guenther >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello group, I was skimming through several recent links on LENR-related news entries/blog posts, when I found this on PESN: http://pesn.com/2012/06/06/9602103_Why_doesnt_Utah_media_cover_latest_cold_fusion_developments/ I'm referring to this excerpt in particular: > Exhibit 4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
