Stremmenos' speaking out is definitely important. Us observers of the scene know about this unpleasant dispute grosso modo.
Let me summarize: 1) Stremmenos definitely, firmly believes in LENR, not as a weak phenomenon, but as a strong one. Not only he BELIEVES, but he claims to KNOW from first hand experience! 2) He has intimate knowledge of the Rossi-DGT- relationship. 2a) From this he accuses DGT of being contractually unreliable/unsound and basically stealing Rossi's technology. 3) Stremmenos has since Aug-2011 NO contact to DGT. 4) He considers Rossi competent and hardworking. "...Respect is due to what, through hard work, competence, and less communication Rossi is striving to accomplish…!" Now viewed from the outside: 1) Rossi appears as a problematic character, both personally and through his presentation of his technology. 2) DGT seems to have a business plan with some flaws. 3) It is unclear whether DGT LEGALLY stole some IP from Rossi. Reminds of Bell and his competitors wrt the telephone. 4) Rossi seems to aspire to trump DGTs claims by jumping ahead with his 600degC e-cat, versus the 400-450degC Hyperion, with higher cost. This could potentially seriously harm DGTs business-model, which rests on cashing of license fees. So this appears being a business-war. Whether Stremmenos is an impartial observer remains unclear. Is he aligned with Rossi? 4a) both (Rossi/DGT) appear to be quite some steps ahead of the rest of the crowd. 4b) both present up to now only CLAIMS with no substantial evidence. 5) the patent issue (even much less: the IP-issue) seems to be completely unresolved. Especially considering the 'fathers' of the technology like Focardi et al. ------------------------- My personal statement: a) There is a rush to the troughs, which is in itself extremely unpleasant, and could get considerably worse, considering the importance of the issue. b) The safety and theoretical aspects are dangerously neglected, which is probably the next 'war-theater', and give the American groups an advantage to catch up in a race they almost lo We will see. On the other hand, the difficult patent/IP issue may have a positive side-effect for us all: i.e. having an open technology. THIS SHOULD NOT BE ABOUT MONEY! There seem to be quite a lot of EGOs involved. But this is a bit idealistic, right? Guenter ________________________________ Von: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Gesendet: 18:46 Mittwoch, 4.Juli 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Christos Stremmenos' rebuttal to Peter Gluck's DGTG interview Thanks! He is right, my first question had to be formulated differently from the point of view of management science. I will answer on my Blog, JONP does not accept my messages. Peter On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> wrote: Hello group, > >
