http://pesn.com/2012/06/30/9602121_Solid_State_E-Cat/
The New Solid State E-Cat -------------------------------------------------------- It is my considered opinion, the new E-Cat Reactor Core is now under precise electric control. Cheers: Axil On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:56 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Recently it has been reported that the latest version of the Rossi ECAT > can operate at 600 degrees centigrade or more without going unstable. This > is a remarkable improvement if accurate and it is suggested that the proof > will be delivered soon. > The earlier versions of the device tended to become unstable when the > temperature increased much beyond the operational level and now that > appears to be under control. To operate in such a manner suggests that > the mechanism which establishes the LENR activity is mostly independent of > temperature of the device. Actually it might imply that now there is a > form of negative feedback operating which tends to throttle back the energy > generation process once a threshold temperature is reached. > I have long hoped that the driver source could become independent of the > output states in LENR devices since that would devoice the devices from the > strong temperature effects that have made stability a big problem to > contend with. Imagine how wonderful it will be if we are able to > control the reaction by just changing the drive with minor temperature > degradations. There has been a lot of recent activity related to carbon > nanotubes and variation in the waveforms driving the LENR devices. Perhaps > Rossi has found a good combination of hydrogen storage with release control > and an electrical signal that work together as a system. Time will > reveal if all or any of this is true. > Maybe someone within the group has knowledge of the operation of the > Patterson cells which seemed to use an electric current as the control > handle. Was that device sensitive to temperature in the manner > associated with positive feedback or more benign as would be expected if > negative feedback were dominate? > I for one would welcome the improvements in the Rossi device that have > been outlined, but have learned from experience that it is easy to say > something remarkable but then not follow up with the goods. Perhaps this > time we will see the results that we so much anticipate. > Dave > >
