Well, it's seems obvious to me; so that they are insulated from mistakes. If major mistakes are found later on, they can deny that was ever what they had.
For example: DGT is using Peter to send out feelers as to their theory being compatible with W&L. Now, you have smart people like Jones pointing out that their theory is more compatible with CQM than with W&L. It seems they want to insulate themselves from such amatuerish mistakes and they've chosen a very eager fall guy. (Not to disparage Peter, cause I would have done the same thing.) If they had published this on their own in their web site, people would point out these amatuerish mistakes and affect their credibility. Now, they can simply deny it and blame it on somebody else. You've got to start thinking more "conspiratorially" Terry :-) Cause conspiracies are probably happening more often in every day life than we are aware of. That Xanthoulis guy leaves a "bad taste on my mouth" from the first time I read his interview. He practically confessed to stealing Rossi's catalyst from the ash analysis results. And having known what the catalyst was, it would have been a straightforward thing to deduce its function. Hence, they could have come up with a better catalyst and claim it as their own innovation. Yes, DGT may have a "better" reactor, but only because they ripped off Rossi's technology and built on it. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Terry Blanton To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:07 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:principles of DGTG 's technology On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote: Peter maybe being set up for a fall. And their reason would be? T
