>From Akira: > Should we interpret this as "Peter Gluck is an independent observer" ?
I would like to go on record saying that if Peter really IS acting as an independent observer, and he opines that as far as he can determine DGT's hyperon data IS valid, I certainly would be far less inclined to dismiss DGT's claims. Peter's assessment would hold weight, as far as I'm concerned. Let me put it this way: It's better than nothing. ;-) Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
