the two claimed change in the test are the following : - first they did full calorimetry, while they initially wanted just rough test to convince skeptics... - second they decided to make analysis of burned reactants
What seems evident is that the testers take the control of the situation, which is logic, since they are bigger . I suspect that it is the testers who ask DGT to sign a NDA, so they can keep the data hidden until all is complete and they can ALL talk together, which each organization protecting the credibility of other. I know big organization, state owned organization, and it is clear that facing a small company like DGT they will set their conditions, not the opposite. don't forget that those organization, and especially the executives, are very afraid to look ridiculous, or even to be accused to work on satanic LENR. as I've heard in the Army, when you do something stupid in group , it will be right. If you do anything alone, even good, it will be disobedience, and the officer will be furious. maybe also they met some problems, and communicate only recently whet they solved them. Note also that they admit that above 550C it can be unstable. 2012/7/19 Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> > On 2012-07-19 17:11, Alain Sepeda wrote: > >> the problem seems to be that client don't trust a greek company, >> so they don't pay, yet. >> Don't forget that they talk about Escrow account. >> maybe also the payment is spread in time. >> >> for now maybe they only have debt and technology. >> >> another reason is that they might try to make pressure about tax >> regulation, EU/government warranty or EU/government funding. This looks >> sharky, but it is common in everyday big business. >> > > > Then, if they really do have the technology and if it works by generating > commercial amounts of fully controllable, repeatable, cheap, high quality > excess heat, why do they paint themselves into a corner by delaying the > publication of test data, third party validations, certifications, etc? Why > wait for ICCF-17, which is after all a relatively obscure event (in the > sense that mostly just people "in the works" or dedicated LENR followers > know about it) ? Wouldn't it be in their best interest to unveil such > results to a much wider and wealthy audience? What am I missing here? > > Wouldn't publicly and undeniably demonstrating such a groundbreaking > technology bring investors from all over the world and quickly secure > DGTG's status (we're supposedly not dealing with milliwatts, watts, or > dozens of watts, but Kilowatts of continuous power)? The more I think about > it, the less everything makes sense. > > I'm still convinced that their latest email *just has* to be a fake/ weird > misinterpretation of the actual facts, because it would be the beginning of > a huge train wreck otherwise. > > LENR: not for the impatient. > S.A. > >
