Chemical Engineer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I happen to be at the Kitty Hawk, NC beach today so i am channeling your > thoughts. > What a great place! I love that that they have a small airfield next to the historic site. > I suggest instead of alienating Mark, which you have obviously already > done, you engage in some meaningful discussion with him. > Not possible. He is one of these know-it-alls never willing to do his homework. I uploaded 1,200 papers he has either not read a single one, or he does not understand them. I mean for crying out loud! "Various reactions that output more energy than is put into them . . ." That could describe anything, chemical or nuclear! It proves nothing and it means nothing. It isn't even factually right, since there is no energy put into some of them. It is blather. This is what passes for science journalism these days. > Also, there are not thousands of reporters writing about cold fusion. > This is not show business, in which any news is good news. Better they should ignore us than publish nonsense based on their own imaginations. Anyway, scientists and engineers download 6,000 papers a week from LENR-CANR.org. We don't need the mass media. We have done an end-run around them. > I do not expect you to listen to me but I know you will read it as I am > your conservative concience. > My conscience?!? Mine's clear. Mass media reporters can kiss my ass! I don't care what they say, and I sure don't care what they think of me. Most of them are useless, lazy, ignorant gits. In the whole history of this field, I can't think of more than a half dozen who bothered to learn anything. The people at "60 Minutes" and a few others. The rest plagiarize Wikipedia. Most of are like Gary Taubes: they don't even know how electricity works. They wouldn't understand the papers even if they did try to read them. - Jed
