Hell yes send it over here! The Collective is all about discussing the fringes. we don't have to worry about 'academic' or 'professional' reputations, so we're open to most all things. and hopefully backed up with some data.
-Mark Iverson From: Jojo Jaro [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one are very interested in looking at this new theory. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Chemical Engineer <mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected] ; [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM Subject: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Just a couple of quick corrections to my previous draft My first instance of "1-8 keV" should have read 1-8 TeV (it was correct in the second usage) and "A negatively charged singularity would feed preferentially from POSITIVELY charged particles" instead of negatively. Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Chemical Engineer <[email protected]> wrote: All, I understand that National Instruments is now calling this a quantum reactor. I have attached a draft of what I believe, without a doubt is the primary Nuclear process formerly known as Cold Fusion or LENR. May they, along with Martin, RIP. There are three primary forms of Nuclear energy in the world, Fission, Fusion & Singularity (Black Hole) Evaporation. The first two can hopefully be retired. Excuse the quality of the draft but you will get the idea. I weighed heavily on a recent CERN study by Chan on black hole creation concerns at the LHC. I would like to have somebody sponsor me on publishing my summary to Arxiv (after I clean it up some). I am going to follow up with some calculations once I brush up on my particle and quantum physics math... It is a beautiful day, don't let it slip away (U2 Bono) Stewart D. Simonson [email protected]
