As an unconnected observer, I am pleased that there is currently three known systems that can form the basis of LENR products in the very near future.
This multiplicity of system’s applications is just what is needed to assure that at least one product will make it into the marketplace. Like any comparison between a set of systems, they each have strengths and weaknesses. Based on this evaluation these factor, I have ranked the utility of these systems in the following order: Papp first at one, Rossi in the middle at two DGTG last at 3. I believe that both Papp and Rossi will find their niche, and DGTG will be eventually pushed out of the market if it just comes down to systems considerations. What could change things is the efficacy of business practices between the three companies. Rossi seems to be in the weakest business position. DGTG is a good company with a good product plan. They will treat their licensees well but the cost of their licenses are in the millions; high compared to Papp who has the best price point at a very reasonable $50,000 each. The unit cost of the Papp system is very cheap; in the hundreds of dollars range whereas the other systems are in the millions each, when all the peripheral equipment is added to their configurations to convert heat to mechanical energy. Cheers: Axil On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Friends, > > I have just published: > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/08/defkalion-s-lenr-from-discovery-to.html > > I want to discuss first the essence of that paper and only later the > details. Est > modus in rebus. > > You already know I am not affiliated to DGTG and all I have invested in > them > is hope and empathy. > > Peter > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
