Kelly,

I believe the process is the same in ALL of these systems that work.

Gas Ionization/Excitement, Confinement, Sparking/Arcing, Reaction.

The reaction gives off additional ions to sustain the reaction without
further outside energy from sparking and arcing if you control it well.

I think that Rossi tube has one or two coils in that tube wall powered by
those wires.  The air is ionized/excited in the center of that tube and
already reacting and radiating heat out the ends and on the inside walls of
the tube, that is why the outside wall is not glowing.  The reaction/heat
is coming from THE AIR.   Once the reaction starts and is controlled by
energy from the coil you can most likely sustain it.

Papp uses Helium ionization/excitement, confinement, intermittent arcing to
trigger the instantaneous reaction which expands the gas to drive the
piston.  Heat is given off but they do not fire the plug continuously so
not as much.

DGT uses ionization, gas confinement in voids/cracks, intermittent arcing
across voids to trigger the reaction.  In the DGT system they are hampered
by having to create a NAE in the nickel lattice.  While that is a good
environment to possibly create new atomic elements (they created 8 NEW
fission and fusion products in their slide) it hampers their heat
production.

Since it is believed lightning in nature can create a similar reaction,
there is no reason it cannot be optimized with these devices.  So far it
looks like we ARE TRANSFORMING MATTER AND ENERGY which is cool.



On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Kelley Trezise <[email protected]>wrote:

> I am attempting to listen to John Rohner explain how his engine work sand
> find it to be painfully difficult. If his resume is real he has a certain
> brilliance but it is obvious from this video that that brilliance does not
> spill over into the skill of expressing oneself verbally.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <[email protected]>
>
>  I think this thing is just a battle between the two . . . both firing
>> blanks.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to