"The flame that burns twice as bright burns half as long." Harry
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > David, > > I must be in the minority here with my expectation that COE > must be at least nearly correct. Perhaps that is my hang up! > > Wait! - this does not need to be related to CoE at all. If you can accept > that radioactive half-life can be changed by many orders of magnitude, then > that is your answer. This is the teaching of the Barker patents, which many > have replicated, but the mainstream rejects the notion. > > Radium-226 has a half-life of 1,602 years. Let's say that with proper > engineering of some unknown feedback variable, the half-life is decreased to > that of Ra-224, a very similar isotope - which is about 3.6 days. > > Instantly you have an emitter which has increased its energy level by a > factor of 150,000 or so, making one gram act like well... you get the > picture. > > If devices of this nature are real then why in the world > would NASA not be using the principle to power their space craft? I refer > to the ones that are drifting in space, not launch. > > There is some talk that NASA was looking at Paul Brown's work. There is also > some talk that his death was not accidental. Quien sabe? > > Jones > > > > >
