He did it... 2012/8/18 Jeff Berkowitz <pdx...@gmail.com>
> Good calorimetry is difficult, but comparisons are not. Wouldn't it be > sufficient to demonstrate two parallel implementations, one with an > unprocessed CONSTANTAN wire and no H2, one with a processed wire and H2, > and measure the difference using the same approach? > > Why do I even have to pose this question? > > Questions like this are what cause the rest of the world to doubt the > whole discipline. How hard is this? What am I missing? Help me out here. > > Jeff > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Robert Lynn **** >> >> ** ** >> >> [snip] Add that 25.2 to the 36.7 and subtract 48 input and you get 14W >> excess…. I think you can pretty confidently state that it is over 10W.*** >> * >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> Nice work. Thanks. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Is there any way to guesstimate – assuming the best reasonable kind of >> insulation is added to retain heat, something like aerogel, etc – how much >> more mass of active wire (if any) would be necessary to get close to a >> nominally self-sustaining system?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Jones**** >> > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
