At 06:09 PM 8/17/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
It is interesting that they claim element generation up to lead.
That also happened in defkalion's data. Check that out.
People, please start to discriminate. This is the slide show:
<http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/LENR%20Korea%20ICCF-17%20Poster.pdf>http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/LENR%20Korea%20ICCF-17%20Poster.pdf
They are calling this "LENR" but that is not obvious. They are
showing evidence for "d-d fusion," which is hot fusion, that is, this
is a different reaction from what is known as cold fusion. It may be
at lower temperatures, but "hot fusion" is actually a name for a
high-energy reaction that has no specific temperature cut-off. It
will occur at lower energies due to tunnelling and other effects.
What the slide show is presenting is evidence for results that are
the known results from hot fusion.
The slide show presents very little information. I was unable to find
any report showing the 62 million neutrons together with how they
were produced.
It is not clear *what* they are claiming. If hot fusion is taking
place, *of course* there would be transmutations.
At some point I should go over Miley's work. It's been a while.
In the classical FPHE, helium is the major transmutation product, by
far, other effects are far down from helium production. But other
effects are found, specifically, tritium, heavier transmutations,
X-rays, short-range charged particle radiation (probably), and even a
few neutrons. One should not lose sight of how rare these other
products are, compared to helium.
