"it makes me wonder why the media in this case seems so inept." ... you
wonder because you have no idea what you're talking about. In this case,
PESN and Hank Mills are tossing out a claim that has nothing to follow up
on ... there's no who, where, or when to chase.

Also, your expectation that "the media" should "have either, confirmed a
fraud OR confirmed something newsworthy" is equally nonsensical. Just
consider that all of you on the Vortex list with all of your enormous
brains applied to the topic for way longer than I've been following it and
with far more scientific knowledge than I have on the topic and with all of
your connections can only, at best, come up with what are ifs and hopes and
theories.

[m]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Randy wuller <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
> Mark Gibbs:
>
> Mark, I agree with you.  However, I am not a journalist.  As a journalist,
> I would expect you to have SOURCES I don't have.  I would expect a
> journalist who is obviously interested in the subject to know more than I
> know, But, I read your articles and find that you provide me NO more
> information than I already have which I might say is very disappointing.
>
> Frankly, by now I would expect the media (and an investigative reporter
> and journalist) to have either, confirmed a fraud OR confirmed something
> newsworthy.  I find they and you have done neither and it makes me wonder
> why the media in this case seems so inept.
>
> Ransom
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Mark Gibbs <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected] ; E-Cat newsletter <[email protected]> ; 
> Sterling
> Allan <[email protected]> ; Hank Mills <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:23 PM
> *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report Confirmed
>
> In the piece by Hank Mills it claims "PESN has obtained satisfactory
> confirmation that a report covering the test does indeed exist." ... the
> article then goes on to completely avoid any details as to what the
> "satisfactory confirmation" might be or who might consider it satisfactory.
>
> The piece concludes with "<If> the test reports that are expected to be
> released at Zurich and then in October show evidence of the above, they are
> worth waiting for." Sure, and if the tests reveal that unicorns are real
> that would also be worth waiting for.
>
> Hank Mills continues: "I would go further; <if> they show kilowatts of
> excess heat and temperatures of up to 1,200C, the wait will have been
> trivial."
>
> If, if, if ...
>
> As my grandmother used to say: "If wishes were horses, beggars would ride."
>
> [Mark Gibbs]
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Sterling Allan <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> **
>> We could have published this much sooner, but with all of the negativity
>> going around presently about Rossi, I thought it deserved a story by itself.
>>
>>
>> http://pesn.com/2012/08/22/9602166_Existence_of_1200_C_E-Cat_Test_Report_Confirmed/
>>
>>
>>    - 
>> <http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Image:120717_hot-cat_R_123482996_1_sq_95x95.jpg>
>>    Featured <http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Latest> / Best Exotic 
>> FE<http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Best_Exotic_Clean_Energy_Technologies>
>>    : Nuclear <http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Nuclear> > Cold
>>    Fusion <http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Cold_Fusion> >
>>    
>> Rossi<http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Andrea_A._Rossi_Cold_Fusion_Generator_(E-Cat)>
>>     >
>>    *Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report 
>> Confirmed<http://pesn.com/2012/08/22/9602166_Existence_of_1200_C_E-Cat_Test_Report_Confirmed/>
>>    * - PESN has obtained confirmation that a report about a third-party
>>    test of an E-Cat module, reaching 1,200 degrees Celsius, does indeed 
>> exist.
>>    We're not a liberty to say more than that, so don't ask. (*PESN*;
>>    August 22, 2012)
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5217 - Release Date: 08/22/12
>
>

Reply via email to