Axil,  This study concludes that tungsten sintering starts at 800-900C

http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/239/

In particular, check out this statement

"Densification of tungsten and tungsten with 10 weight percent ceria begins 
between 800 and 900 ºC and densities greater than 90% can be achieved at 
temperatures as low as 1500 ºC."

I don't know about you but they have confirmed the start of "Densification" 
(read: sintering and atom migration), at 800-900C. These are for micron-sized 
tungsten powders.

No, my firend, not even Tungsten will make a suitable metal lattice NAE if 
Rossi's cats are indeed operating at 1200C.

Also, I don't believe the leaked pictures.  It is quite convenient for 
Fioravanti to be involved in the leak.  I think Rossi was the one who 
authorized the release of that Leaked photo to misdirect.  I don't think that 
leaked photo has anything to do with his real cats.  Using gas for heating is 
also questionable.  I think Rossi is feeling the heat from other replicators 
that he needs to quickly misdirect with this leaked photo and gas nonsense. 

Even this 1200C operating temp might be a misdirection, cause this is beginning 
to look more and more impossible considering the thermal properties of many 
metals.  A stainless steel reactor at 1200C would not be able to hold much 
pressure, let alone hydrogen at these temps and high pressures.  Hydrogen 
embrittlement attack rates at these temps accelerate rapidly.

Whatever thermionic catalyst he had in his original cats would be useless at 
1200C, that's for sure.  So, his process must be radically different now. 

Once again, if you accept that Rossi is operating at 1200C, then you have to 
accept the logical conclusion stemming from that statement, that is, that he is 
using Carbon nanostructures.

 

Jojo

 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 7:18 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:ECAT Simulations With Third Order Temperature Dependency


  I hear what you are saying JoJo, but Rossi says he will use natural gas only 
for external power in  his 1200C reactor. This means that the reactor is still 
thermionic in nature (No nanotubes). He could be using tungsten carbide as the 
micro powder(4 microns) to avoid sintering. 



  Cheer:     Axil


  On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote:

    In-situ HRTEM obeservations of CNT tip growth in a small gas-reaction CVD 
cell of nickel nanoparticle catalyst reveal that the nickel nanoparticle was 
changing shape indicating that they were in liquid form at a temperature of 
600C.  I suspect iron nanoparticles would also be in liquid state very near 
this temperature; and forget about copper, it would be melted at much lower 
temps.

    That is why I am still of the opinion that Rossi's 1000C or 1200C ecats, if 
real, must be Carbon nanostructure based.  No metal nanoparticle NAE, cavity, 
voids, and vacancies will survive 1000C, let alone 1200C without signiificant 
deformations of the nanocavities that house your NAE.  Even refractory metals 
like tungsten in nanopowder form would probably start sintering and migrating 
at these levels.

    Can anyone think of a metal in nanopowder form that will not start to 
sinter at 1200C?  Only carbon nanostructures will survive these temps.

    Hence, when you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains however 
improbable must be the truth.  Rossi's cats MUST be carbon nanostructure-based. 
 And once more, time will prove me right about this.



    Jojo



      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: ChemE Stewart 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:49 AM
      Subject: Re: [Vo]:ECAT Simulations With Third Order Temperature Dependency


      Nanopowder typically melts at lower temperatures than its equivalent 
solid.


      On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> 
wrote:

        Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

          Does the maximum level of external temperature spike ever get above 
1450C at any point?

        Ah. Google tells me that is the melting point of Ni . . .


        Actually, you cannot get close to a melting point without bad stuff 
happening. Sintering and local melting. The temperature is not likely to be 
uniform.


        - Jed





Reply via email to