On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:43 PM Jones Beene said [snip] However, it is during a local excursion that a secondary reaction can occur, which does indeed violate CoE, to the extent it is gainful in itself.[/snip] Agreed, and nature being what it is you would also expect an equal loss for excursions in the opposite direction where reactions that should have occurred at nominal are instead delayed. My posit being that Casimir geometry and lattices perform double duty when gas atoms are introduced, In addition to segregating the pressure / breaking the isotropy they also confine the gas molecules in a biased manner to one of these segregated regions as compared to the other. I think this is why we have claims of both accelerated radioactive decay and delayed radioactive decay based on the gas and metals used. Fran
performing double duty by scaling and segregating these normally unexploitable forces from below the Planck scale and also exhibiting confinement properties toward diffusing gas molecules such that reactions occurring in these balanced zones do not simply cancel out. I sometimes wonder if time dilation introduces another option to the standard mass to energy consideration where energy is obtained via accelerated aging of the gas atoms? Would the spontaneous emissions of an atom over an epoch be able to pile up on a temporally Fran -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Ahern's ILENRS-12 Presentation - "Energy Localization" Ahern under-emphasizes the "super-radiance" and "sub-radiance" balance in this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation. DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance - proposes that certain spatial areas can undergo intense semi-coherent energy excursions (localized energy extremes) which are nominally perfectly balanced against adjoining areas, where kinetics are correspondingly muted. At this primary level there is no gain. However, it is during a local excursion that a secondary reaction can occur, which does indeed violate CoE, to the extent it is gainful in itself. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] His example of spring coupled point masses seems to circumvent the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, by focusing rather than diffusing kinetic energy. As in endothermic chemical reactions, this is (probably) just an apparent violation of the 2nd Law, except occurring at nuclear/particle scales.
