Another typo, I'm afraid. The "hot-cat-data" file was an addendum to the validation report Rossi presented in Zurich -- the test was done on July 16, 2012. Both these files are in my Scribd account where I have uploaded various documents .
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > ** ** > > *From:* Patrick Ellul **** > > ** ** > > Rossi's numbers in a spreadsheet: > http://www.scribd.com/doc/109919735/Rossi-Validation **** > > ** ** > > There is a data file on this linked page called “hot-cat-data”:**** > > ** ** > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/105325449/Hot-Cat-Data**** > > ** ** > > The assumption seems to be that this is the data in question but maybe > not. **** > > ** ** > > Problem is – this is 15 months old – from July 2011 **** > > ** ** > > If one waited to try to validate data via IR blackbody assumptions - which > data had been available for over a year, and if the COP was really anywhere > close to 11+, as claimed - then is it not fair to ask – *why not validate > by closing the loop* instead of a method that is even more suspect than > the prior “wet steam” fiasco?**** > > ** ** > > Closing the loop will essentially “stuff it down the throats” of skeptics > and make Rossi an instant billionaire. That’s a pretty good incentive for > an egotist like AR.**** > > ** ** > > Here are quite a few small turbines with more than enough efficiency to > easily close the loop at 1000C.**** > > ** ** > > http://www.infinityturbine.com/ORC/IT10_ORC_System_For_Sale.html**** > > ** ** > -- Frank Acland Publisher, E-Cat World <http://www.e-catworld.com> Author, The Secret Power Beneath <https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/>
