Jeff, If the 1922 Irion-Wendt experimental results were correct, current density is probably more important.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/1900s/1922Wendt-Irion.pdf -- Lou Pagnucco Jeff Berkowitz wrote: > There is a history surrounding the apparent production of iron from arcs > between carbon rod electrodes. Extremely high voltages are not required. > You can find some material from obvious web searches. > > Jeff > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> See >> >> >> http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Jx78YcF-F8U/TBNnrA0L3WI/AAAAAAAACN4/_tuQ1t6BT5w/s1600/neutron_yield_in_dpfs.gif >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Focus fusion among a few others has been at this for many years. They >>> produce a plasmoid using a high current formed spark. They get a >>> trillion >>> neutrons from fusion per shot using deuterium. >>> >>> Focus fusion uses a light magnetic field and a low pressure gas. >>> >>> Cheers: Axil >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Akira - Thanks for the link to Santilli's patent application. >>>> >>>> A more readable pdf-format version is at - >>>> http://images3.freshpatents.com/pdf/US20120033775A1.pdf >>>> >>>> Santilli is making very specific claims of observed transmutations, >>>> and >>>> at measurable levels - e.g., Deuterium + Carbon --> Nitrogen. >>>> He also predicts the byproducts for various reactions. >>>> >>>> To defend the patent, I assume he is confident he can replicate this. >>>> >>>> His method involves morphing atomic electron orbitals with very strong >>>> magnetic fields ( > 10^10 Gauss) in intense current arcs in gases >>>> during >>>> dielectric breakdown which permit nuclei to be forced near enough for >>>> fusion. >>>> >>>> LENRs have been reported in other arcing and electron beam >>>> experiments. >>>> >>>> Has anyone looked at his approach and have any opinions? >>>> >>>> -- Lou Pagnucco >>>> >>>> Akira Shirakawa wrote on Thu, 18 Oct 2012 01:59:10 -0700 >>>> > >>>> >On 2012-10-18 10:42, Mint Candy wrote: >>>> > [...] >>>> >A more convenient link to the patent: >>>> >http://www.google.com/patents/US20120033775 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
