>From Terry:

> Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
> statement.  It was meant to express a general willingness to
> be open toward the end.

I second that.

I have an anecdotal story regarding someone I knew who once
encountered Sagan in a casual setting. A group of cohorts, including
Sagan, were meeting in a hotel bar for a couple of drinks. As the
drinks flowed and tongues got a little looser, Sagan slipped out a
personal incident he once experienced where he wanted to get funding
to study how would society react if we were suddenly confronted with
irrefutable evidence proving beyond a shadow of doubt that
extraterrestrial civilizations existed. Sagan said he could not get
funding for such a project. It's my understanding that Sagan was also
told in no uncertain terms that he should drop the exploration of
further proposals of such a nature... that is, if he wanted to keep
his good standing. The observer of this conversation was left with the
distinct impression that Sagan did not like being told what he could
and could not research. But Sagan knew which side of the bread the
butter was on. And that was that.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Reply via email to