I don't accept the claim that there is nothing done under conception. I agree that there are still doubt whether there is existing conception of LENR reactor, BUT there are clear evidence that there is probably such conception done by first Defkalion (who claim enough problems you can estimate with faire confidence that they have something real), by Brillouin even if early state, and also by Rossi (because of claims of people orbiting around him - Rossi being a black hole for trust, invisible itself but detectable by it's influence around).
It is uncertain, but uncertainty should not be translated into nonexistence, or even in probable nonexistence. My internal consensus is that : P>=0.95 that there is at least a working reactor design currently tested and requiring only industrialization work. you can disagree with my number, but P<0.5 seems a clear mistake from the data we have. Even Rossi alone is above that. That none of the reactor is working would requires conspiracy style of explanations or black swan events. I cannot guarantee that black-swan p<0.05, leading to my p>=0.95 of a working reactor design somewhere today. beside that I estimate P>0.90 that convincing mainstream will be impossible with any scientific evidence, any test, any demo. Only an industrial success can break the denial. So yes, no conception will be accepted until it is manufactured and installed. 2012/11/9 Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be> > ** ** > > ** ** > > For the 2 fields that are conception and manufacturing, there is currently > nothing occurring for LENR (except a small start from Rossi). Without a > “proof of concept”, it’s too early to invest there. Once it will be > demonstrated that a LENR device can be scaled up and controlled, private > investments will flow from everywhere. The LENR issue isn’t currently here. > **** > > >
