Speaking of Rossi, from his weblog: Curious November 30th, 2012 at 7:10 AM
Dear Andrea, I cannot believe what I’m hearing: that FINALLY, in the immediate future, there will be an independent validation of the E-Cat! This is MOMENTOUS news! But I’ve been somewhat disheartened by your undermining the impact of said report. This leads me to speculate that: 1. The report will be published in a way that only a very niche audience will be privy to its existence. 2. The third-party validator will not be a credible entity, or will suffer from a “conflict of interest”. 3. The identity of the third-party validator will not be revealed, thus invalidating the whole point of the validation. If none of the above is the case, I cannot think of a scenario under which there would NOT be a huge public reaction from the report. Being in the know, perhaps you are not fully appreciative of the power of having a trustworthy entity step in to validate a part of your claims, and thus by extension, adding immense credibility to ALL of your claims. Andrea Rossi November 30th, 2012 at 9:59 AM Dear Curious: 1- not true 2- whomever makes the validation, thousands of wannabe competitors will say ” the only real validator is me”. I am tired of all these stupidities. No conflict of interest will be around : the only conflict of interest that I see is the conflict of our competitors that would be eager to become the validators. And never forget a foundamental thing: in any case, the sole real validator is the Customer, who pays the plant only if the plant works. Is this so difficult to be understood? 3- same as above Warm Regards, A.R. <end> Hanging tough.
