Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Combining data from the table on the left and the new graph (and some > plausible assumptions) I managed to plot a graph of input power vs excess > power: > > http://i.imgur.com/L9CV7.png > > At the highest point it's 21.8% more output power than the input. > Good job. Again, this gives me a bad feeling. The curve is too smooth. Too predictable. Cold fusion excess heat never happens in a fixed ratio compared to input, or as a varying function of input. It is not predictable. With powder, you see nothing at low temperatures, and then it appears, but it fluctuates. This kind of smooth, predictable-looking curve is characteristic of an artifact. I am not saying it is an artifact for sure, but it makes me uncomfortable. As I said yesterday, above all, they need calibration data in the same range as the anomalous heat. That would put to rest most of my concerns. - Jed
