On 2012-12-08 23:27, Jed Rothwell wrote:
They are doing this now? Or do you mean they did it before but those
data points are not published yet.
That's what they did. The graphed calibration data points are in the
document I previously linked. It's certainly not the full data set. It's
supposed to be a small addendum to the 2-pages preview posted yesterday:
http://www.22passi.it/pirelli/Grafico%20calibrazione%20test%20per%20Celani.pdf
Data points, although are of different colors, are from the same run.
That is just their fancy way to show the temperature ranges where
normally (under activated conditions) there is excess heat and where
there isn't.
I'm aware there's not enough information to properly understand what's
and how's their method, but that's the way it is right now. We will know
more in a week.
Calibrating with a gas other than hydrogen also seems like a bad idea to
me. They need a wire that is definitely inert, in hydrogen and other
conditions as similar to the active run as they can make them [...]
I didn't intend to enter into discussions whether their calibration
approach is solid or not, just presenting the facts as they're coming in.
Cheers,
S.A.
