What you are objecting to is more an artifact of software leveling and choices made in how data is presented - than an actual problem of results being too smooth. McKubre's chart has already been leveled and could be leveled more - and the MFM charts could be altered the other way to accentuate the small point-to-point differences, and it would appear spikier - if they desired to present it that way.
I do not see this as a real issue. From: Jed Rothwell Jones Beene wrote: That is not typical. The key to Dardik's technique - the very essence - is to provide the "superwave" of power input . . . Input is atypical, but the fluctuations in output are typical. Here is another example: http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/McKubre-graph-2.jpg The fluctuations in the live cell are larger than the ones in the control cell. Figure 1 here shows a remarkably stable reaction: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesMelectrochec.pdf It still fluctuations more than the MFM reaction. - Jed
