The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5 degrees larger than it was during calibration. I put the details in the progress blog comments.
Jeff On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Craig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/14/2012 03:53 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: > > Is everyone taking into account the fact that the graphs for > > T_Glassout are actually (T_Glassout - T_Ambient), while the graph for > > T_Glassin is the raw T_Glassin and is not corrected for ambient? Or at > > least so they are labeled. > > > > Jeff > > > I don't think that's relevant for this issue. The temperature of the > inside of the glass appears to be the same in both the calibration runs > and this current test, for the same power level applied. This implies > that the extra temperature on the outside of the glass is some sort of > artefact. > > Craig > >
