On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: > At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote: > >> There are other Naudin sites which suffer the same problem. >> >> Jones > > > I see that Sterling Allen's page on the MHG project by Naudin never > benefited from an explanation of the input power error. It's got some > enthusiastic posts from you. Maybe you'd like to be the one to add a comment > there? > > http://pesn.com/2005/06/26/9600116_Naudin_MAHG/ > > This is listed by PESN as an "Open Sourcing Project/Active Tier 2" > > Looks totally dead to me. > > PESN repeats the claim that the Moller work is "Based on decades-old > concepts set forth by Nobel laureate." > http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:GIFNET#In_the_News > > That is highly misleading. Langmuir did not report an energy anomaly. Moller > has himself made an error of three decimal places (interpreting Kcal as cal) > in understanding the heat of dissociation of molecular hydrogen into atomic > hydrogen, thus misinterpreting Langmuir's figures as somehow indicating a > far higher heat of recombination than dissociation. In fact, Langmuir's > figure was a little low, it was obviously an approximation.
I suspect there is something important missing from this account. What promted Moller to look at Langmuir's work in the first place? Harry
