Finding X-rays from a glow discharge (plasma, basically) is one
thing, finding them from a low-energy environment is quite another.
This is not to denigrate the research cited. It's just not relevant
to what had been mentioned, Storms finding of X-radiation *without* a
glow discharge. Yes, there had been lots of reports of X-rays before,
see Storms' book.
However, the circumstances of X-ray production, and association with
other LENR evidence, is important. Correlated reports are rare.
Rather, someone runs an experiment, say, and has some X-ray film
sitting there, and it ends up with some exposure, and then people
argue about causation and possible artifacts. Correlation with other,
independent effects, cuts through this noise.
At 02:04 PM 12/20/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Karabut also found signs of x-rays, before Storms announced, since
2005, presented in ICCF12:
Karabut A. Research into Energy and Temporal Characteristics of
X-ray Emission from Solid State Cathode Medium of High-Current Glow
Discharge, Proc. ICCF12 (2005),
<http://www.iscmns.org/iccf12/Karabut_2.pdf>www.iscmns.org/iccf12/Karabut_2.pdf
See more from Karabut:
<http://www.iscmns.org/library.htm>http://www.iscmns.org/library.htm
See the papers concerning the same subject, even in the JCMNS vol.
6, where Karabut published with Hagelstein:
<http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol6.pdf>http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol6.pdf
2012/12/20 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
<<mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>a...@lomaxdesign.com>
The evidence for radiation never became truly strong and confirmed,
such as it was. Storms is now reporting X-rays from certain
experiments, but that's not confirmed.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
<mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>danieldi...@gmail.com
